{"id":1233,"date":"2011-05-11T10:10:27","date_gmt":"2011-05-11T09:10:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/esmartproducts.co.uk\/?p=1233"},"modified":"2011-05-11T10:10:27","modified_gmt":"2011-05-11T09:10:27","slug":"budget-2011-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.suretyfp.com\/wordpress\/?p=1233","title":{"rendered":"Budget 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>Chancellor George Osborne\u2019s speech in full<\/h3>\n<p>Mr Deputy Speaker, last year\u2019s emergency Budget was about  rescuing the nation\u2019s finances, and paying for the mistakes of the past.  Today\u2019s Budget is about reforming the nation\u2019s economy, so that we have  enduring growth and jobs in the future. And it\u2019s about doing what we  can to help families with the cost of living and the high oil price.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>We understand how difficult it is for so many people across our  country right now. That we are able now to set off on the route from  rescue to reform, and reform to recovery, is because of difficult  decisions we\u2019ve already taken. Those decisions have brought economic  stability. And without stability there can be no sustainable growth or  jobs. Without stability Governments have to keep coming back to their  citizens for more \u2013 more taxes and more spending cuts.<\/p>\n<p>In Britain, we do not have to do that today. We inherited a  record budget deficit. But we have set out a credible, comprehensive  plan to deal with it. We have had to undertake difficult measures. But  we have already asked the British people for what is needed, and today  we do not need to ask for more.<\/p>\n<p>So this is not a tax-raising Budget. But nor can we afford a  giveaway. Taken together the measures I will announce today are fiscally  neutral across the period. This is a Budget built on sound money. A  Budget that encourages enterprise. That supports exports, manufacturing  and investment. That is based on robust independent figures. A Budget  for making things not for making things up.<\/p>\n<p>Britain has a plan. And we\u2019re sticking to it. In recent months,  many other countries have seen their ratings downgraded and their  borrowing costs soar. Our country\u2019s fiscal plans have been strongly  endorsed by the IMF, by the European Commission, by the OECD, and by  every reputable business body in Britain. And for anyone who questions  whether this matters in the real world, to real businesses and families,  consider this.<\/p>\n<p>Market interest rates in Greece are<br \/>\n12.5%, in Ireland they are close to 10%, in Portugal and Spain  they are 7% and 5%. Today our country\u2019s market interest rates have  fallen to 3.6%. We have a higher deficit than Portugal, Greece and  Spain, but we have virtually the same interest rates as Germany. This is  our powerful monetary stimulus to our recovering economy.<\/p>\n<p>Stability. Credibility. Lower interest rates. This is what  we\u2019ve achieved. But stability is not enough. So today, in addition to  the Red Book, we are publishing the Plan for Growth. For this Budget  confronts the hard truth that has been ignored for too long. Britain has  lost ground in the world\u2019s economy and needs to catch up. In the last  decade, other nations have reduced their business tax rates, removed  barriers to enterprise, improved education systems, reformed welfare and  increased exports.  Sadly the reverse has happened in Britain.<\/p>\n<p>We gambled on a debt-fuelled model of growth that failed. With  the state now accounting for almost half of all income, we simply cannot  to go on like this. Britain has to earn its way in the modern world.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Deputy Speaker, I turn now to the forecasts. Last November I  told the House that the recovery was going to be more challenging than  recoveries from recessions in recent decades. That is inevitable when  we\u2019ve had the sharpest fall in output since the 1930s, the highest  budget deficit in peacetime, and the largest banking crisis in our  entire history.<\/p>\n<p>But I said that thanks to the course we have set, the  independent forecast was for our economy to grow in each of the next  five years, for unemployment to peak this year and then fall and for  employment to rise through this Parliament. That remains the case in the  independent forecast published today. Those forecasts have been drawn  up by the Office for Budget Responsibility.<\/p>\n<p>This important change has transformed the way Budgets are put  together. So instead of Chancellors fixing the figures to fit the  Budget, they now have to fix the Budget to fit the figures. Yesterday,  the legislation to put the Office for Budget Responsibility on a  permanent, statutory and independent footing received Royal Assent.<\/p>\n<p>I am sure that the whole House will want to thank Robert Chote,  Steve Nickell, Graham Parker, and their whole staff for the very  professional job they are doing. Let me start with their growth  forecasts. It has been known for Chancellors in recent years to rattle  these off at great speed in the hope that no one will keep up. I will  not do that.<\/p>\n<p>Although average quarterly growth this year is set to be higher  than was previously forecast, the annual forecast for 2011 has been  revised to 1.7%. This the OBR attributes specifically to the weaker than  expected final quarter of last year, the rise in world commodity prices  and the higher-than-expected inflation in the UK. However, the OBR  point out that the effect, in their words, \u201ccreates scope for slightly  stronger growth in later years\u201d than previously forecast. So while they  expect real GDP growth of 2.5% next year, they forecast it will then  rise: to 2.9% in 2013; to 2.9% in 2014; followed by 2.8% in 2015.<\/p>\n<p>The European Commission has also this month published its  growth forecasts. These show that the UK is forecast to grow more  strongly in the coming year than Spain, Italy, France, the average for  the Eurozone and the average for the EU. All countries have to steer a  course between two central risks. The risk of a European sovereign debt  crisis on the one hand and on the other the risk that comes from rising  global commodity prices. Food prices around the world have increased by  nearly 50% since the beginning of last year. Oil has risen<br \/>\n35% rise in just 5 months.<\/p>\n<p>That is why the OBR expect inflation to remain between 4 and 5%  for most of this year, before dropping to 2.5% next year and then to 2%  in two years time. I have today written to the Governor of the Bank of  England to confirm that the inflation target for the Monetary Policy  Committee will remain at 2%, as measured by the Consumer Prices Index. I  can also confirm that the Asset Purchase Facility set up by my  predecessor will remain in place.<\/p>\n<p>One cause of current instability is the conflict inside Libya.  The whole House will praise the courage and professionalism of our armed  forces, who are trying to bring that conflict to an end and save lives.  And I can confirm that the additional cost of military operations will  be met entirely from the Treasury reserve. The House will also know that  last week I authorised for the UK to take part in a co-ordinated G7  currency intervention in support of the Japanese Yen. Our hearts go out  to the Japanese people \u2013 and this is one way we can help. It is still  too early to say what lasting impacts the earthquake and tsunami will  have on the world economy.<\/p>\n<p>But this is an opportunity for me to report that we had already  decided to rebuild the UK\u2019s foreign currency reserves, which are at a  historically low level. We will purchase a range of high-quality assets \u2013  though unfortunately, with the price of gold now at record highs, we  will not be able to replenish the gold reserves sold at record lows.<\/p>\n<p>I turn now to the fiscal forecasts for our debt and deficit.  Borrowing to fund the deficit this year is now set to come in at \u00a3146  billion, below target. Then fall to \u00a3122 billion next year. Then \u00a3101  billion the year after; then \u00a370 billion in 2013\/14; then \u00a346 billion  2014\/15; followed by \u00a329 billion<br \/>\nby 2015\/16.<\/p>\n<p>Inflation has had its impact but crucially the OBR assess that  next year\u2019s structural deficit remains the same as forecast last  November. In other words, the size of the task of repairing Britain\u2019s  finances is unchanged. Our national debt, as a share of our national  income, is forecast to be 60% this year, before peaking at 71%, and then  starting to fall<br \/>\n\u2013 reaching 69% by the end of the period.<\/p>\n<p>This leads me to one of the central tasks of the OBR. That of  assessing the Government\u2019s performance against its stated budget goals \u2013  in an open and independent way, so that we avoid repeating the  disastrous experience of the so-called golden rule. Our fiscal mandate  is to achieve a cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the  rolling five year forecast period<br \/>\n\u2013 which is currently 2015\/16.<\/p>\n<p>We have supplemented that with a fixed target for debt: so that  debt should be falling as a proportion of GDP by the year 2015\/16 as  well. I can report to the House that the OBR confirm that on their  central forecast we will meet both these objectives \u2013 a balanced  structural current budget and falling national debt by the end of the  Parliament. Indeed, the forecast remains that we will meet both these  objectives one year earlier. But, Mr Deputy Speaker, I said at the start  that stability and fiscal responsibility was not enough.<\/p>\n<p>Our country has to compete if we are going to create growth and  jobs. Britain has fallen behind many others in the world in the last  decade. We\u2019ve dropped from 4th to 12th place in the global  competitiveness league. And growth in our country has been so  unbalanced. Consider this staggering truth \u2013 during the boom years  before the bust, private sector employment actually fell in a region as  important as the West Midlands. So today\u2019s Budget is an urgent call to  action for Britain. Private sector growth must take the place of  Government deficits. Prosperity must be shared across all parts of the  UK.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, we want the City of London to remain the world\u2019s leading  centre for financial services, but we should resolve that the rest of  the country becomes a world leader in advanced manufacturing, life  sciences, creative industries, business services, green energy and so  much more. This is our vision for growth.<br \/>\nDifficult decisions and major reforms are needed to make it  happen. But the alternative is to accept Britain\u2019s economic decline and a  continuing fall in living standards for our population. And that is not  an alternative anyone in this House should be prepared to accept. This  Budget sets for Britain these four economic ambitions. That Britain  should: Have the most competitive tax system in the G20; be the best  place in Europe to start, finance and grow a business; be a more  balanced economy, by encouraging exports and investment; and have a more  educated workforce that is the most flexible in Europe.<\/p>\n<p>Let me set out the measures now that will achieve these  ambitions. First, taxation. Here\u2019s the truth \u2013 Britain used to have the  3rd lowest corporate tax rate in Europe. It now has the sixth highest.  At the same time, our tax code has become so complex that it recently  overtook India to become the longest in the world. Adam Smith first set  out the principles of good taxation. This Government declares these  principles again today for the modern age. Our taxes should be efficient  and support growth. They should be certain and predictable. They should  be simple to understand and easy to comply with.<\/p>\n<p>And our tax system should be fair, reward work, support  aspiration and ask the most from those who can most afford it. In July  last year, we set up the Office of Tax Simplification to provide  independent advice on how to reduce the complexity of the existing  system. I want to thank Michael Jack and John Whiting for the work they  have done. Following their recommendations, I can announce today that  this Budget abolishes no fewer than 43 complex reliefs. This includes  the \u2018millennium gift aid system\u2019 \u2013 which we won\u2019t need for another 989  years.<\/p>\n<p>I have decided not to follow their advice to abolish the  Community Investment Tax Relief \u2013 and instead I encourage people to take  it up. But this Budget at a stroke removes over 100 pages from our tax  code and begins the work of simplification. In the last Budget, I  announced that from next month welfare payments and public service  pensions would be up-rated in line with the Consumer Prices Index. I  said at the time we should also consider up-rating the tax system in the  same way. So from April 2012, the default indexation assumption for  direct taxes will move to CPI. There will be protection through this  Parliament for those eligible for age-related, married couple and blind  person\u2019s allowances \u2013 and for employers National Insurance  Contributions.<\/p>\n<p>The increase in the personal tax allowance already announced  will vastly exceed anything lost through employee NICs up-rating, and  that\u2019s even before any further increases in that allowance. This will  bring coherence to the tax and benefit system, and we look at moving  indirect taxes onto the same basis when the fiscal position allows. But  there is one further step we should now undertake that will dramatically  simplify the tax system.<\/p>\n<p>For decades, we have operated Income Tax and National Insurance  as two fundamentally different taxes and forced businesses large and  small to operate two completely different systems of administration,  with two different periods and bases of charge. The resulting anomalies  are legion. And it imposes totally unnecessary costs and complexity on  employers, and costs the taxpayer in the extra burden it places on HM  Revenue &amp; Customs.<\/p>\n<p>So I am announcing today that the Government will consult on  merging the operation of National Insurance and Income Tax. I am not  proposing we extend National Insurance to pensioners, or to other forms  of income, or that we abolish the contributory principle.<\/p>\n<p>Our purpose is not to increase taxes, it is to simplify them.  And this huge task will therefore require a great deal of consultation  and take a number of years to complete. But it is time we took this  historic step to simplify dramatically our tax system and make it fit  for the modern age.<br \/>\nMaking our tax system more competitive is another challenge for  the times we live in. Again, let\u2019s face facts. Other countries are quite  deliberately making their tax systems more competitive, and attracting  multi-national companies away from the UK. We could stand there and do  nothing. But increasing the living standards of every hard pressed  family in the country depends on keeping those companies, and the jobs  and the investment and the tax revenues that come with them, here in the  UK.<\/p>\n<p>So we will go ahead with the highly competitive tax rate on  profits derived from patents in industries like pharmaceuticals. We will  fundamentally reform the complex rules for Controlled Foreign Companies  and make them more territorial. We will introduce new rules that  effectively apply an ultra-competitive 5.75% rate on overseas financing  income. That will give us a far more attractive system than France,  America or Germany. I want Britain to be the place international  businesses go to, not the place they leave. But today I want to do even  more. So I can today announce that from April this year Corporation Tax  will be reduced not just by 1% as I previously announced but by 2%. And  it will continue to fall by 1% in each of the following three years \u2013  taking our corporate tax rate right down to 23%. 16% lower than America,  11% lower than France and 7% lower than Germany \u2013 the lowest  Corporation Tax rate in the G7.<\/p>\n<p>Let it be heard clearly around the world \u2013 from Shanghai to  Seattle, and from Stuttgart to Sao Paolo: Britain is open for Business.  And to ensure that this is not a net tax cut for banks, I am adjusting  the Bank Levy rate next year to offset its effect. In each and every  year of this Parliament our permanent Bank Levy raises more than the  one-year bonus tax of the last Parliament. The most competitive tax  system in the G20 is the first of our economic ambitions.<\/p>\n<p>The second is that Britain becomes the best place in Europe to  start, finance and grow a business. Again, let\u2019s face facts: we are not  that today. In the last decade, countries like Germany, Denmark, Finland  and the Netherlands have all overtaken us in the international rankings  of competitiveness. That is not surprising when the total cost of  regulation imposed on business since 1998 is almost \u00a390 billion a year.<br \/>\nSo in today\u2019s Plan for Growth we take action: \u00a3350 million worth  of specific regulations will go \u2013 including the Equality Act\u2019s costly  dual discrimination rules; Lord Young\u2019s recommendations on health and  safety laws will be implemented in full; The no-win no-fee legal  services that prey on employers will be restricted; Existing regulation  will be scrutinised by the public.<\/p>\n<p>And from April, we are going to impose a moratorium exempting  all businesses employing fewer than ten people \u2013 and all genuine  start-ups \u2013 from new domestic regulation for the next three years. We  will take this fight against regulation to Brussels, where my RHF the  Prime Minister is this week recruiting other European allies to ensure  our continent doesn\u2019t price itself out of the world. And we are going to  tackle what every Government has identified as a chronic obstacle to  economic growth in Britain, and no Government has done anything about:  the planning system.<\/p>\n<p>Councils are spending 13% more in real terms on planning  permissions than they did five years ago, despite the fact that  applications have fallen by a third. Yes, local communities should have a  greater say in planning, but from today: We will expect all bodies  involved in planning to prioritise growth and jobs; We will introduce a  new presumption in favour of sustainable development, so that the  default answer to development is \u2018yes\u2019; We will retain existing controls  on greenbelt \u2013 but we will remove the nationally imposed targets on the  use of previously developed land; And we will allow certain use class  changes, introduce time limits on applications and pilot for the first  time ever auctions of planning permission on land.<\/p>\n<p>Cumbersome planning rules and bad regulation stand in the way  of new jobs. So too does the shortage of finance. Small businesses are  the innocent victims of the credit crunch. That is why we have agreed  with the banks a 15% increase in the availability of credit to small  businesses. But the lack of start-up capital has been a long standing  problem in the British economy. Too often we have the great ideas in  Britain but it\u2019s other countries that exploit them. So today I announce  sweeping changes to improve the generosity, the simplicity and the reach  of the Enterprise Investment Scheme. From April this year, Income Tax  relief will increase from 20% to 30%. Next year we will double the  amount that any individual can invest through the EIS, increase the size  of company that can qualify for investment \u2013 and raise the limit on the  amount that can be invested in a company by 400%.<\/p>\n<p>And next week my RHFs the Prime Minister and Business Secretary  will launch \u2018Start-Up Britain\u2019, a new campaign by entrepreneurs for  entrepreneurs, supported by many of Britain\u2019s most successful firms,  that will help people start and grow businesses. Today we can add to  that help. From 6th April this year I am doubling the size of  Entrepreneurs Relief to \u00a310 million. Let Britain be the home of  enterprise in an age when people can invest all over the world.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s time too that we ended the uncertainty around the taxation  of non-domiciles. They are very welcome in this country, but I\u2019ve always  believed that they should pay something in return for their special tax  status. The last Government followed our advice and introduced a  \u00a330,000 charge for those who had lived here for seven years. I think we  can ask more from those who\u2019ve been here even longer, so I\u2019m increasing  the charge to \u00a350,000 for non-doms who have been in the country for 12  years. This will raise over \u00a3200 million in the coming years.<\/p>\n<p>But in return \u2013 and to encourage investment in our country \u2013 I  am removing the tax charge when non-doms remit foreign income or capital  gains to the UK for the purpose of investing in a British business. And  we will introduce a statutory residence test. To end the speculation  and uncertainty, and to provide stability, I confirm that I will be  making no further changes to the taxation of non-domiciles in this  Parliament. In an age when businesses and capital and people can  increasingly move anywhere, high tax rates can do real damage.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s true for high corporate taxes. It\u2019s true for high  personal tax rates too. They crush enterprise, undermine aspiration and  often undermine tax revenues as people avoid them. I am clear that the  50 pence tax rate would do lasting damage to our economy if it were to  become permanent. That is why I regard it as a temporary measure. Just  as my Labour predecessor, the RHM for Edinburgh South West, did when he  introduced it.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve said before that now wouldn\u2019t be the right time to remove  it, when we\u2019re asking others in our society on much lower incomes to  make sacrifices. For we\u2019re all in this together. But I think it\u2019s  sensible to see how much revenue it actually raises. I\u2019ve asked HMRC to  find out the truth when the self-assessment forms start coming in. Of  course, taxation must be fair. It\u2019s right that the wealthiest should pay  more than others. And it\u2019s especially wrong when they avoid taxes.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ll have more to say later on tax<br \/>\navoidance and evasion, but there\u2019s one area that needs extra  work in the coming months, and that\u2019s on the taxation of very high value  property, where evasion and avoidance are widespread and some of the  wealthiest are not paying their fair share. So as well as reviewing  revenues from the 50p tax rate, we will also be redoubling our efforts  to find ways of ensuring that owners of high value property cannot avoid  paying their fair share.<\/p>\n<p>Help for small businesses. A boost for enterprise. Reforms to  planning. Cuts to existing regulations and a moratorium on new ones. All  part of our ambition to make Britain the best place in Europe to start,  grow and finance a business. Our third ambition is to encourage  investment and exports as a route to a more balanced economy for  Britain.<br \/>\nIn the Plan for Growth we publish today, we set out specific measures we can take to help a wide range of businesses.<\/p>\n<p>In life sciences, where we will radically reduce the time it  takes to get approval for the clinical trials. In our digital and  creative industries, where we will improve the intellectual property  regime. In our professional and business services, one of our unsung  success stories, we will reform our burdensome money laundering regime,  promote the UK as the global centre of legal arbitration, and launch a  new trusted business visa service. Our retail sector includes many small  shop keepers anxious about the impact of coming business rate rises.<\/p>\n<p>The last Government planned that the current rate relief  holiday for small businesses should end in October this year. I don\u2019t  think that would be right. So I can announce that, at a cost to the  Exchequer of \u00a3370 million, I will extend the rate holiday for small  businesses for another year \u2013 to October 2012.  We will also take action  to help the construction industry.<\/p>\n<p>Stamp Duty will now be levied on the mean value of the houses  being purchased within a portfolio \u2013 not the bulk cost. And Real Estate  Investment Trusts will be simplified to encourage home-building. But  average mortgage deposits are close to 30% and this puts home ownership  beyond the reach of many many families. This is not fair.<br \/>\nSo I can announce that \u2013 from the proceeds of this year\u2019s Bank  Levy \u2013 we will fund a \u00a3250 million commitment to first-time buyers.<\/p>\n<p>A new shared equity scheme, First Buy, will be available for  first-time buyers who want to purchase a newly built property, but who  cannot afford the high deposits. This will help 10,000 families get on  to the housing ladder for the first time. The previous Government  intended to end the temporary changes to the Support for Mortgage  Interest scheme next January \u2013 instead we will extend it for another  year. That will reduce mortgage arrears for around 100,000 out-of-work  homeowners.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Deputy Speaker, manufacturing is crucial to the rebalancing  of our economy. Over the last decade, the share of the economy accounted  for by financial services increased by over two thirds \u2013 while  manufacturing\u2019s share fell by almost a half. Under this Government  manufacturing is now growing at a record rate \u2013 and 14,000 more jobs  have been created in the sector in the last 3 months. To help this  continue, the Government announces plans today to: Make our export  promotion more entrepreneurial and create new export credits to help  smaller businesses; Launch Britain\u2019s first Technology and Innovation  Centre for high-value manufacturing; And fund a further nine new  university centres for innovative manufacturing.<\/p>\n<p>Science is one area where Britain already has an advantage over  many other countries \u2013 and it is central to our future as a place to  create businesses. That\u2019s one reason why I protected the science budget  from cuts last year. I can tell the House that I have been able to find,  again from this year\u2019s extra Bank Levy, an additional \u00a3100 million to  invest this year in new science facilities at: The Babraham Research  Campus in Cambridge; The Norwich Research Park for environmental and  life sciences; And the International Space Innovation Centre at Harwell;  The National Science and Innovation Campus at Daresbury.<\/p>\n<p>But if Britain is really to become a home of innovation then we  want research and development to take place not just in our great  universities, but in our smaller businesses too. One of our greatest  high tech innovators, James Dyson, has urged me to increase the support  they get. I have listened to him, and gone even further than he  recommends.<\/p>\n<p>From April this year the small companies Research and  Development Tax Credit will rise to 200% \u2013 and from next year it will  rise again to 225%. We also want to encourage manufacturers to invest in  the latest machinery and technology. So I propose to double the limit  on the capital allowances for short life assets from four years to eight  years.<br \/>\nAnd the allowance for the renovation of business premises in  assisted areas \u2013 which was due to expire next year \u2013 we will extend for a  further five years. Supporting the private sector across the whole of  the United Kingdom is central to our economic ambitions.<\/p>\n<p>Savings in the Transport Department mean that we can also afford  \u00a3200 million of additional investment in our regional railways. We will  go ahead with the \u00a385 million Ordsall Chord scheme, linking  Manchester\u2019s Victoria and Piccadilly stations and significantly reducing  journey times between Liverpool and Leeds. We can commit to \u2013 and I  know many HMs have been calling for this \u2013 the Swindon to Kemble  redoubling scheme. And this will complement our electrification of the  Great Western Main Line to Wales. And we can find another \u00a3100 million  to help councils repair the winter potholes on<br \/>\nour roads.<\/p>\n<p>Helping all parts of our country succeed is also the purpose  behind the new Enterprise Zones we launch today. Mr Deputy Speaker there  has been reports that we would be able to fund 10 new Enterprise Zones.  Today I confirm that instead we will fund instead 21 new Enterprise  Zones. Businesses will get up to 100% discount on rates, new superfast  broadband and the potential to use enhanced capital allowances in zones  where there is a strong focus on manufacturing. In return for radically  reduced planning restrictions, we will let local authorities keep all  business rate growth in their zone for a period of at least 25 years to  spend on development priorities. The first ten Enterprise Zones will be  in urban areas of highest need but also potential. In: Birmingham and  Solihull; Leeds; Liverpool; Greater Manchester; The Tees Valley;  Tyneside; The Bristol area; The Black Country; Derbyshire and  Nottinghamshire; and Sheffield.<\/p>\n<p>Tomorrow, my RHFs the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister  will announce some of the specific locations of these new Enterprise  Zones. And I confirm that a further Zone will be located in London \u2013  where I have asked the Mayor to choose a suitable site.<br \/>\nA further ten Enterprise Zones will be announced in the summer. I  want Local Enterprise Partnerships all over the country to come forward  with proposals.<\/p>\n<p>Responsibilities are devolved in Northern Ireland, Scotland and  Wales, so we will work with the administrations so that they too can  enjoy the benefits of this policy. In Northern Ireland, tomorrow the  Treasury will publish a paper on how we help their private sector to  grow. To deal with the unique issues posed by the Irish Republic\u2019s  business tax regime, it considers the case for Northern Ireland having  an even lower rate of Corporation Tax than the rest of the UK.<\/p>\n<p>I look forward to engaging with all parties there on the way  forward. There is one other particular issue that affects a specific  part of our country. And that is the very high water bills for customers  in the South West, because of the geography there, particularly for  those on lower incomes. So we will come forward with public money to  help bring their bills down.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Deputy Speaker, let me turn now to opportunity presented by  the green energy revolution \u2013 and our determination to be the greenest  Government ever. We\u2019ve already announced our ambitious Renewable Heat  Incentive and support for low emission cars, and changes to the company  car tax regime today increase that support. Our Green Deal to reduce the  energy bills for homes will be introduced next year, and I now confirm  that we will act to incentivise and encourage its take up.<\/p>\n<p>We are pioneering new Carbon Capture and Storage technology  with \u00a31 billion already provided \u2013 and future projects will be funded  out of general spending rather than a complex new levy. But we need to  take two further, bold steps if we are to make the green energy  revolution a reality.<\/p>\n<p>First, as I have long-argued, investment in green energy will  never be certain unless we bring some stability to the price of carbon.  Today we become the first country in the world to introduce a carbon  price floor for the power sector. The price will start at around \u00a316 per  tonne of carbon dioxide in 2013 and move to a target price of \u00a330 per  tonne in 2020. This will provide the incentive for billions of pounds of  new investment in our dilapidated energy infrastructure. To ensure  customers get a fair deal, we will closely follow developments in the  energy sector in the light of the OFGEM review published on Monday.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time I am extending the Climate Change Agreements  to 2023, and increasing the Climate Change Levy discount on electricity  for those who sign up from 65% to 80% from April 2013. This will help  our most energy intensive industries. Green taxes will increase as a  proportion of our total tax revenues, as we promised.<\/p>\n<p>The second bold step we take today is the creation of the Green  Investment Bank, to support low-carbon investment where the returns are  too long-term or too risky for the market. We\u2019ve already committed a  billion pounds to it. Today I commit two billion pounds more, funded  from asset sales and underwritten by the Treasury. This will enable the  Green Investment Bank to start operation one year earlier than planned \u2013  in 2012.<br \/>\nIt will leverage an additional \u00a315 billion of private sector  investment in green projects over this Parliament. I can also confirm  today that from 2015\/16 and subject to our overall debt target being  met, we will allow the Green Investment Bank to borrow and invest in a  better future. So a Green Investment Bank with its resources trebled. A  new Carbon Price floor. New capital allowances for manufacturing. New  support for homebuilders and first-time home buyers.<\/p>\n<p>An economy where the growth happens across the country and across all sectors.<\/p>\n<p>That is our ambition. And leads me to this fourth ambition. To  create a more educated workforce that is the most flexible in Europe.  Britain\u2019s working age population has lower skills than the populations  of America, Germany and France. That\u2019s probably the biggest problem  facing our economy in the future. That\u2019s why we\u2019re undertaking  far-reaching reform of our schools and universities, and funding a Pupil  premium and additional early years support for our most disadvantaged  children in poverty. That is why we commissioned Alison Wolf\u2019s  impressive report.<\/p>\n<p>The Government is committed to funding new University Technical  Colleges which will provide 11-19 year olds with vocational training  that is among the best in the world. The curriculum is being developed  in close co-ordination with both local universities and leading  employers \u2013 and I commend Ken Baker for getting these new colleges up  and running in our manufacturing heartlands. To date the Government has  announced that it will fund 12 new University Technical Colleges.<\/p>\n<p>I can tell the House we will provide funding to double that number  to at least 24. We will also deal directly with the challenge of youth  unemployment that has been on a steady rise for the last seven years,  and give people direct contact with the work place. Instead of 20,000  young people benefiting from our new work experience scheme, as we  planned, we will increase that number fivefold \u2013 to 100,000 places over  the next two years.<\/p>\n<p>In Austria, Germany and Switzerland around one in four  employers offer apprenticeships. In England fewer than one in ten do.  That\u2019s got to change. Last year, my RHF the Schools Minister published a  Skills Strategy and confirmed the largest ever expansion in adult  apprenticeships. Today, I am funding another 40,000 apprenticeships for  young unemployed people. There are currently only 1,500 higher level  apprenticeships across the whole of England. This Budget provides for  10,000 more. That brings a total of 250,000 more apprenticeships over  the next four years, as a result of this Government\u2019s policies. A  Government backing what works, real training, secure jobs, more growth.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Deputy Speaker, we shouldn\u2019t talk about those at the start  of their working life \u2013 without also talking about those who are coming  to the end of their working lives and looking to retirement. I am very  proud that it was this Coalition Government that took the decision to  re-link the basic state pension to earnings \u2013 and guarantee its increase  through a triple lock. This would simply not have been affordable \u2013 as  Adair Turner\u2019s report argued \u2013 without an increase in the State Pension  Age. The State Pension Age is set to rise to 66 by 2020. I can tell the  House that we will now seek \u2013 hopefully with all-party support \u2013 a new,  more automatic mechanism for future increases in the State Pension Age  based on regular, independent reviews of longevity.  This is another  major reform that will help Britain live within her means. We also need  to make sure that our public service pensions are both fair to those who  give their working lives to help others, and fair to the taxpayers who  have to fund them.<\/p>\n<p>Today we publish the result of our consultation on the discount  rate, which shows that a more appropriate rate would be inflation plus  GDP growth. This reinforces our case for increasing the employee  contributions by an average of 3 percentage points. Indeed, the new  discount rate could be used to justify further contribution rises. As  part of the wider reforms, I am not proposing to ask for more than the 3  percentage point average. John Hutton has now completed his final  report, which looks at the pension benefit. I am sure Members in all  parts of this House will want to thank him for a very impressive piece  of work.<\/p>\n<p>I confirm today that the Government accepts Hutton\u2019s  recommendations as a basis for consultation with public sector workers,  unions and others. There should be no cherry-picking on either side. I  believe this House should also recommend similar changes to the pensions  of MPs. And we should also address the state pension system, which has  become unbelievably complex. If people can\u2019t work out what they\u2019re going  to get in retirement, or how much will be clawed back by the  means-tests \u2013 then they can\u2019t work out what they need to save.<\/p>\n<p>So the Pensions Minister, the Pensions Secretary and I have  worked together to develop options including a new single-tier pension.  It would be simple; it would be based on contributions; it would be a  flat-rate, so people know what to expect. And it would cost no more than  the current system. We currently estimate this new single-tier state  pension would be worth around \u00a3140 per week. It will not apply to  current pensioners \u2013 and it will take years fully to come into effect.<\/p>\n<p>As with the other major reforms I have announced today to  simplify our tax system, improve our economic performance and reform our  public sector pensions \u2013 this Government is doing the right thing for  the long term. The most competitive corporate taxes. The best place to  start-up and run a business. An investing, exporting, greener more  balanced economy. A better educated workforce. A fairer pensions system.  These are our ambitions for Britain. With the measures to match.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Deputy Speaker, let me now turn to personal taxes and  duties. And let me start by noting that a society should not just be  judged by the strength of its economy, but also the compassion of its  people. The Culture Secretary and I have been working on a series of  substantial reforms that will support giving, from the largest donations  to the coins collected in the charity bucket.<\/p>\n<p>First, we will dramatically simplify the administration of Gift  Aid. Instead of asking charities to submit a written record of every  donation made, we will by 2013 pay for a much easier online system.<\/p>\n<p>Second, we will encourage wealthy people in our society to give even more.<\/p>\n<p>The Gift Aid benefit limits will be increased from \u00a3500 to \u00a32,500 so that charities and museums can say thank you properly.<\/p>\n<p>We will consult in the coming year on how to encourage the  donations of pre-eminent works of art and historical objects to our  nation in return for a tax deduction. And we will introduce from April  next year this major change to our Inheritance Tax system.  If you leave  10% or more of your estate to charity, then the Government will take  10% off your Inheritance Tax rate. Let\u2019s be clear. No beneficiaries will  be better off. Just the charities. To the tune of \u00a3300 million. I want  to make giving 10% of you legacy to charity the new norm in our country.<\/p>\n<p>The third reform we make to the charitable taxes is not about  the biggest donations, but the smallest. We will introduce a new scheme  where Gift Aid can be claimed on small donations, up to a total of  \u00a35,000 a year per charity, without the need for donors to fill in any  forms at all. That means Gift Aid on the contents of the collecting tin  and the street bucket. 100,000 charities will benefit to the tune of  \u00a3240 million.<\/p>\n<p>Together, these represent the most radical and most generous  reforms to charitable giving for more than twenty years. Do the right  thing for a charity, and the Government will do the right thing by you.  It\u2019s a big help for the Big Society. But our charity does not extend to  those in our society who seek to avoid paying their fair share of taxes.<\/p>\n<p>Tax avoidance and evasion mean that we have to ask more from  working families. And that is not fair. Unfortunately, not enough has  been done in recent years to tackle this injustice. HMRC estimate that  \u00a314 billion was lost through avoidance and evasion in 2008. Today we  publish our new strategy paper on Tackling Tax Avoidance and we take  specific measures to shut down the open abuses that have been allowed to  continue for too long.<\/p>\n<p>We will close down three forms of Stamp Duty Land Tax  avoidance, tighten capital gains rules for companies \u2013 and end the  practice of disguised remuneration, which sees highly paid employees  offered tax-free, lifetime loans that are never repaid. And we\u2019re going  to tackle the exploitation of low value consignment relief that has left  our high street music stores fighting a losing battle with warehouses  in the Channel Islands. In total, on the numbers audited by the  independent OBR, the tax avoidance measures in this Budget raise around  \u00a31 billion a year \u2013 that\u2019s \u00a34 billion over the Parliament. We are doing  more today to clamp down on tax avoidance than in any Budget in recent  years.<\/p>\n<p>And that gives us more resources, in a fiscally neutral budget,  to help those families who do pay their taxes \u2013 but who are struggling  with the daily cost of living. We have already taken steps to help from  this April. I am glad to report that following measures in my Budget  last year, every local authority in England has chosen to freeze council  tax in the coming year. Compared to the amount council tax could rise  by, this freeze will save a family in an average band D property \u00a372 a  year.<\/p>\n<p>In two weeks time the child tax credit for lower income  families will increase by an additional \u00a3255. I can confirm today that  in the coming year all workers in the armed forces, prison service, NHS,  teachers and civil servants earning \u00a321,000 a year or less will receive  a pay uplift of \u00a3250. As I said last year, the National Insurance rate  rise which the last Government announced will have to go ahead. But  because we have increased the threshold, it will actually be cheaper to  employ people on incomes of less than \u00a321,000 than it is today. That\u2019s  how we\u2019ve stopped Labour\u2019s jobs tax.<\/p>\n<p>And anyone earning less than \u00a335,000 a year will also be better  off because in 14 days\u2019 time the personal Income Tax allowance \u2013 the  amount people can earn tax free \u2013 will go up by \u00a31,000. That\u2019s the  largest rise in history. That means in real terms around \u00a3160 extra per  year, or \u00a3200 in cash terms, for 23 million taxpayers. The Coalition  Agreement commits this Government to real increases in the personal  allowance each and every year. And sets this country the goal that no  one earning less than \u00a310,000 should be caught in the Income Tax net.<\/p>\n<p>This Budget today takes another step towards that valuable  goal. I can confirm that from April next year the personal tax allowance  will increase by a further \u00a3630, to \u00a38,105.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s another real increase of \u00a348 extra per year, or \u00a3126 in  cash terms. Together with this year\u2019s rise, a total of \u00a3326 extra money  each year for those working hard to pay for their family\u2019s needs. And it  means, just ten months into office, this coalition Government has taken  1.1 million low paid people out of tax altogether.<\/p>\n<p>And one more thing. Last year, we restricted the allowance  increase to basic rate taxpayers. This year we have not. The result is  that there will be no more people pulled into the higher rate tax band  as a result of this Budget.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Deputy Speaker, let me turn to excise duties. First, Air  Passenger Duty. We hoped we could replace the per passenger tax with a  per plane tax. We have tried every possible option, but have reluctantly  had to accept that all are currently illegal under international law.  So we will work with others to try to get that law changed. In the  meantime, we are consulting today on how to improve the existing and  rather arbitrary bands that appear to believe that the Caribbean is  further away than California.<\/p>\n<p>We will also seek to bring private jets, which pay no duty at  all, into the scope of taxation. The wealthiest should not escape the  tax the ordinary holidaymaker has to pay.<\/p>\n<p>And I can tell the House that with the hefty duty rise last  year, and with the cost pressures on families, we think it would be fair  to delay this April\u2019s Air Passenger Duty rise to next year.<\/p>\n<p>Let me turn to duties on alcohol. We have already announced  plans to increase duty on the strongest beers and cut in half the duty  paid on low alcohol beers. Beyond that I can tell the House I have no  further changes to announce to the rates of alcohol duty put in place by  the previous Government. As usual these changes will come in at  midnight on Sunday. As announced by my predecessor, tobacco duty rates  will increase by 2% above inflation.<\/p>\n<p>However, it is clear that the structure of          the tobacco duty regime is being exploited to produce cheaper  cigarettes. So we will change the regime to narrow the differential  between these lower cost brands and the rest, and between cigarettes and           hand-rolled tobacco. This will reduce smoking and improve our  nation\u2019s health. These tobacco duty changes will come into          effect at 6pm this evening.<\/p>\n<p>I turn now to other excise duties. Rates of vehicle excise duty  will increase by inflation only \u2013 and we will freeze rates for Heavy  Good Vehicles to help our hauliers. I am also proposing to increase the  Approved Mileage Allowance Payments. This mileage rate has not increased  at all since 2002, making those who depend on their car for work  increasingly worse off. It will now increase from 40 pence to 45 pence  per mile. And I can tell the House that we will extend this relief to  cover volunteers travelling as passengers \u2013 as charities and others have  been calling for over many years.<\/p>\n<p>All other duty rises will remain exactly as planned by the previous Government.<\/p>\n<p>Except Fuel Duty. The price of petrol has become a huge burden  on families. In the last 6 months, the cost of filling up a family car  such as a Ford Focus has increased by \u00a310. This rise has also hit  businesses hard, especially small businesses. And it is important that  when shocks like the steep rise in the oil price occur, a responsible  Government is able to listen and respond. Let\u2019s be clear about what\u2019s  within our control and what is not \u2013 so we don\u2019t raise false hopes.<\/p>\n<p>British Governments are not in charge of the world\u2019s oil price.  As we\u2019ve seen, events like those in the Middle East can push the cost  of petrol at the pump higher. But British Governments are in charge of  the duty we levy on petrol. And the previous Cabinet put in place before  they left office a new fuel duty escalator that involved seven fuel  duty increases. Three have already taken place, adding just over 3p to  the price of petrol. The third step on the escalator is due to come into  effect next week, and that would add almost another 5p to the price of a  litre of petrol.<\/p>\n<p>I have made it clear that I would          listen to the concerns put to me by so many people.<\/p>\n<p>Many have suggested that we should use the extra revenues we  automatically get from the North Sea. It\u2019s true that they go up when the  oil price rises, but the OBR confirms that rising oil prices also cause  other tax revenues across the rest of the economy fall by a similar  amount. I am not prepared to undermine the public finances like that.  Others in this House have suggested that we create a separate VAT rate  for petrol.<\/p>\n<p>The Treasury has examined this proposal. It wouldn\u2019t fully  offset their 5p rise that\u2019s coming. It would take six years to come into  effect. And that\u2019s because it turns out to be illegal. So I have  decided to reject this approach and do something different. The North  Sea Oil tax regime was most recently changed in 2006, when the price of  oil stood at $66. It is now almost double that amount. That means the  oil companies are making unexpected profits on oil prices that are far  higher than those they based their investment decisions on.<\/p>\n<p>Other oil-producing countries have a tax regime that  automatically regulates returns when prices rise. We do not \u2013 and the  North Seais too mature to introduce such a regime now. Instead, we can  do something else. We can introduce a Fair Fuel Stabiliser.<\/p>\n<p>From tomorrow the supplementary charge levied on oil and gas  production will increase from 20% to 32%. Even after this, profits on a  barrel of oil are forecast to be higher in the next five years than in  the last 5 years. That will raise \u00a32 billion additional revenue.<\/p>\n<p>And we will use the new tax money to do this. First, we will  delay the inflation rise in duty planned for next week until next year \u2013  and also delay the April 2012 inflation rise until the following  summer. Second, the fuel duty escalator that adds an extra penny on top  of inflation every year will be cancelled \u2013 not just for this year, or  next year \u2013 but for the rest of this Parliament. But I don\u2019t want  important investment in the North Sea lost. So if the oil price sustains  a fall below $75, and we will consult on the precise figure, we will  reintroduce the escalator and reduce the new oil tax in proportion.<\/p>\n<p>That is how it will work. No escalator when the oil price is  high. No extra tax on the profits of North Sea oil companies if the oil  price falls and stays low. It\u2019s a Fair Fuel Stabiliser. And the result  is this for Britain\u2019s hard-pressed families. I\u2019ve made sure there will  be no fuel duty rise this year. I have cancelled the fuel duty escalator  when the oil price is high. And one final thing. As well as stopping  these fuel duty rises I am today cutting fuel duty by 1 penny per litre.  This will take effect in petrol stations from 6pm tonight.<\/p>\n<p>I know that by itself this will not end the pressure on family  budgets. But we\u2019ve done what we can to help. Help for families. Help for  businesses. A Government that listens and helps. Mr Deputy Speaker,  There were some who said that this year my job was to help families with  the cost of living. There were others who said \u2018no\u2019, my task was to  back enterprise, support business and undertake far-reaching reform to  help the economy grow. It is the central understanding of this  Government &#8211; and core to our strategy \u2013 that these are not two separate  tasks. They are one and the same thing.<\/p>\n<p>We are only going to raise the living standards of families if  we have an economy that can compete in the modern age. So this is our  plan for growth. We want the words: \u2018Made in Britain\u2019, \u2018Created in  Britain\u2019, \u2018Designed in Britain\u2019, \u2018Invented in Britain\u2019. To drive our  nation forward. A Britain carried aloft by the march of the makers. That  is how we will create jobs and support families. We have put fuel into  the tank of the British economy.<\/p>\n<p>And I commend this Budget to<br \/>\nthe House.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chancellor George Osborne\u2019s speech in full Mr Deputy Speaker, last year\u2019s emergency Budget was about rescuing the nation\u2019s finances, and paying for the mistakes of the past. Today\u2019s Budget is about reforming the nation\u2019s economy, so that we have enduring growth and jobs in the future. And it\u2019s about doing what we can to help&#8230;  <a class=\"excerpt-read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.suretyfp.com\/wordpress\/?p=1233\" title=\"ReadBudget 2011\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.suretyfp.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.suretyfp.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.suretyfp.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.suretyfp.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.suretyfp.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1233"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.suretyfp.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1233\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.suretyfp.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1233"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.suretyfp.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1233"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.suretyfp.com\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1233"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}